ABOUT allDAY

allDAY is the official TODAY blog, your virtual window to Studio 1A and the people who make America's favorite morning show come alive. Whether it's exchanging views with the anchors and contributors or going behind the scenes with the producers, editors, camera people and more, we'll bring you the buzz here at 30 Rock, and we hope you will make this a regular part of your online routine. We want this to be a conversation, so please respond with your comments and questions directly to the blog, and we'll do our best to post what you have to say.



'Don't Tase Me, Bro!'

Posted: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 8:22 AM by Dan Fleschner
Filed Under:

We're in Day 3 of the University of Florida "Taser" story, and this morning, Rob Griscti, the lawyer for Andrew "Don't Tase Me, Bro!" Meyer, spoke with Matt for a few minutes. WATCH VIDEO


Photo by Andrew Stanfill -- Independent Florida Alligator

As I've watched the coverage of this story unfold over the past couple days, I was kind of confused as to what exactly happened. It's sometimes hard to understand the context of one of these cell phone videos that gets released with only sketchy details.

Now that a lot more information -- including the police report -- has become public, we have a better understanding of what went down.

In my view, this was a publicity stunt -- but one with a message. That message has largely been lost in the questions of whether Meyer's free speech was infringed, whether police overreacted or whether he's simply desperate for attention (or all of the above).

Our reaction -- as members of the news media, as viewers and consumers of culture -- is the point.

According to an article in the Gainesville Sun, Meyer wrote a post on his Web site about how the media is too focused on entertainment and not on more important stories, like the Iraq war.

He wrote, "The news is designed to keep viewers watching and sedated and not thinking bad thoughts about America, because that would be bad for the economy. Stories about a severely unbalanced budget are out, train wrecks like Paris and Anna are in. A train wreck may be senseless and pointless, but Americans sure do love to watch."

This guy saw an opportunity to prove his point, and with the help of the police, he did it even more effectively than he could have dreamed.

At one point, Meyer was a student writer for the Fort Lauderdale Sun-Sentinel, where he wrote of himself, "Andrew tries to write mostly whimsical nonsense columns about nothing in particular, yet occasionally finds himself angry enough to rain down fire and brimstone on an unsuspecting politician or celebrity."

I don't think there's any doubt that he went to this lecture with Senator Kerry intending to make a scene (there is plenty of evidence on his Web site that he views himself as something of a prankster), hoping to turn a harangue into a video worthy of posting on YouTube and his own site.

He says he wanted to ask Kerry about supposedly important issues, one of which was whether Kerry and President Bush were members of the Yale secret society Skull and Bones. Does a question like that have anything to do with discourse on Iraq? Was he trying to suggest that Kerry and Bush are secretly in cahoots because of their past connections? I have no idea.

Before launching into his diatribe, Meyer made sure that cell phone cameras were rolling to catch whatever happened. He was probably hoping to get Kerry to say or do something embarrassing. Instead, he got something else.

He famously got Tasered and arrested, though according to the police report, he later told officers, "I am not mad at you guys, you didn't do anything wrong, you were just trying to do your job."

More to the point, he got something even more than an embarrassing YouTube moment: he turned himself into a national figure. And a least for a few days anyway, we're all watching.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

have you people heard that someone made a dance mix?


<a href="http://www.myspace.com/revolucian">Don't Taze Me Bro Dance Mix!</a>
sue the police under "freedom of speech ..."
"freedom to rally..."
unlawful police abuse exsisted here and alterneative mthods would have applied such as "letting student voice opinion."
period. fgood luck bro!
Kerry is a coward! The rest of the audience acted like sheep!

This givernement is slowly establishing a police state.  They are constently testing our threshold.

STAND UP. DON'T FEAR THE GOVERNMENT.  THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD FEAR US.
The student was excited, he should not have shrugged off the police. Tasering him was uncalled for. This is still America isn't it?Or has Bush suceeded in his quest of a dictatorship?
  The student had legitimate questions on why Kerry did not further look into the illegal voting practices of bush supportors. The company that runs the electronic voting was found guilty in civil court but for some odd reason the governor decided against pursuing criminal actions.
     It is about time that these polititions start answering our questions!!
Small minds understand small concepts. If he had simply gotten up and asked his question, it would have been answered, and the answer would have meant generally nothing as far as effecting change.  He did not only draw attention to himself, he drew attention to his questions and, hopefully, it draws attention to the subject matter.  Yeah, and he wanted to enjoy a little bit of fame.  Publicity stunts also have value.  So what?  Good job, son.  Dare to challenge the lazy minds of today's youth and the comfortable minds of out elected politicians.  And good for you, Sentator Kerry.  You were a radical in your youth throwing your medals over the Whitehouse fence.  You attempted to answer the man's questions even while the police were dragging him to the door.  You are both winners.  The Police?  They were doing their job and helped to create the senationalism this young man needed to draw attention to himself and his questions and to the fact that it does not take much for the media to froth at the mouth over events, such as this one, which really hold little importance compared to war, starvation, and other much more important problems which continue to plague the world.
To anyone who felt he was "resisting arrest"

Please show some proof of the crime he committed, and then I will humbly and gladly kiss your feet.

"An illegal arrest is an assault and battery. The person so attempted to be restrained of his liberty has the same right to use force in defending himself as he would in repelling any other assault and battery."
State v. Robinson, 145 ME. 77, 72 ATL. 260

"Citizens may resist unlawful arrest to the point of taking an arresting officer's life if necessary."
Plummer v. State, 136 Ind. 306."
Right on, bro! Look how many uptight freaks post here about how "unruly" or uppity this guys was. Hey, guess what, bros? Public discourse isn't always organised, lame and pretty. Tough questions need to be asked at times, and tough answers must be coaxed out from the nitwits we seem to enjoy electing time and time again. America was founded upon questioning authority and limiting the power opf the hubris-filled power junkies by giving the people more rights than the politicians. Get over it. Deal with it. And maybe you should try to get a little involved yourselves once in a while, bros.
So, tasers are no longer a "non-lethal alternative" I guess. It seems, by what I've been reading here, that police officers believe that tasers are a "tool to subdue anyone who resists them." I think otherwise. I belive that if a single cop is trying to subdue someone, and they are unable to, and the criminal may get away or physically harm that police officer, then the use of the taser may be warranted. I DO NOT believe it is O.K. for police to be torturing a person in order to cause them to "submit voluntarily, facing similar continued torture."

Tasers are not SUPPOSED to be torture devices, but apparently they have become legal turture devices that police are "allowed" to use. It is wrong for them to be used this way. Just like it is wrong for a police officer to shoot a man in the back to prevent him from getting away, it is wrong for six police officers to taser a unarmed man who they already have on the ground.

The fact that they were soooo incompetent that SIX of them could not get the handcuffs on the guy just proves how untrained they are. The university is at fault as much if not more than the cops, because they did not prepare their security force properly.

I think that Andrew Meyer should win a serious law suit against the university.
Wow I Can't believe the number of people that have commented on this story that don't believe in the right of free speech. I don't care what demographic you belong to after watching several different films of the same incident (The one on youtube is best because it shows the entirety of Meyers comments)the only AMERICAN response is to support Meyers. I wonder have a majority of you people ever been to a Q&A with a national politcian. These guys who would aspire to a public life of leadership should be asked hard and even embaressing questions. The true test of a leader isn't during the good times but rather when the chips are down, and after Meyer asked some decent questions and the police attacked him Kerry failed to act. I would have expected more from a storied Vietnam activist.
he was asking 4 attention, but there were more than enogh officers to carry him out without the tazer thats ridiculous,.
all i see on this video is that taser really works. Unfortunatlly, tasing is the only way to get some ppl civilized. Hippies in San Fransico want to make an anarchy and call everyone a fashist who wants to live in civilized society.
This was a rational and reasonable response to a premeditated and extended disruption of a legally sanctioned event.  We have laws and no one should be allowed to cause a ruckus at the expense of all of the other people that came to participate civilly.  Had he been respectful and not fought officers for several minutes he would have been allowed to leave.
I don't understand why this student was not allowed to ask his question. He may have been phrasing it very rudely and the senator might not have wanted to hear it, but this was a question and answer time. He barely went over 1 minute when they cut him off and ARRESTED him. He wasn't doing anything but voicing his opinion in an open forum. This really shouldn't have escalated this far within 5 minutes. At any point was he given rules of what to talk about or what level his voice should be? Was he asked to be nice or nicely asked to leave? Why resort to violence?
I would like to commend this young man for his comments on the show.  This boy took the time to read a book, process the information, question it, and look for answers.  Did he go about it the right way?  That is yet to be seen.  It seems that has learned from his mistake but did he really make a mistake... In today's society where anything goes and in a culture that glamorizes lifestyles of the rich & famous, I really don't know that he made a mistake. After all, how else would he get the attention that he felt his questions deserved.

After listening to him during his brief interview, I applaud him for taking responsibility for his actions and tryng to shift the focus off of the tasering incident.  Too often we get caught up in the drama that the media plays up and it appears that this young man is still looking for answers to the questions he set out to get the day of the forum.  And for that alone I commend him. The manner in which he conducted himself today has now sparked my interest and would like to know the nature of his questions.
He broke the law! He was disrespectful and showed no regard or respect to a senator of the United States. How is this little child's outburst attributed to the Bush administration? I he broke the law and he broke the rules. As soon as he started fighting with police, they had every right to subdue this law breaker. There are times and ways to get your point across. Acting a fool does not help your cause, the saddest cause, if well put and timed has better leverage than a temper tantrum. I hope he acted that way in court, which I know he did not!
It is insane that people are blaming the student here!!  How is anyone "at fault"  or "being unruly"  when they are asking a politian a question.  It was a direct and difficult question, but he had every right to ask it.  In fact his right to ask it is protected in our constitution...though it seems that the police officers and a few people who posted here haven't read that document.
He did not break any laws when the police first grabbed him. He was being rude with his question, but Kerry said ill answer the question as he was being dragged away. There was absolutly no reason to tase him with 5 officers pinning him down. brutality plan and simple.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

Syndicate This Site

Add allDAY to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google